Page 18 - Demo

Experimental results are highly promising, correcting known low-response channels
• Most channels haven’t changed dramatically, which falls within theoretical expectations for “shape” of signal
• Note particularly the beam energy points, which are expected to be peaks
• In the original signal, there is a dip at the full beam energy component - known to be unphysical since this dip moves when 𝐵()* is changed
• The calibration corrects the signal as hoped!
• To reiterate, this is a relative calibration – that is, relative amplitude of signal between channels
Presenter: Gabriel Player
18