Page 1 - An Interesting Poster to look at from the Tri Alpha Energy Team in California
P. 1
Near-infrared Bremsstrahlung Radiation Measurements in an Advanced Beam-driven FRC Plasma
BACKGROUND & MOTIVATION
PREVIOUS MEASUREMENTS: C-2 & C-2U
Titanium gettering, however, introduced impurity lines that polluted Bremsstrahlung measurements near 523 nm
Resulted in overestimated values of the effective ionic charge
NEAR-INFRARED VS. VISIBLE BREMSSTRAHLUNG
NEAR-IR BREMSSTRAHLUNG DIAGNOSTIC: C-2W
In C-2W, an upgraded diagnostic system will be deployed
to measure Bremsstrahlung near 1000 nm (FWHM: 10nm) Silicon avalanche photodetectors (APD)
Laser Components A-CUBE-S1500-01 Responsivity of ~45 A/W at 1000 nm Ø1.5 mm detector chip
System bandwidth of 1 MHz
Active T compensation electronics
NIR system will be paired with a Da system to remove contributions from pollutants (share the same view)
Tangential mount will enable edge data collection
Survey spectrometer capabilities extended to 1100 nm
Pulsed NIR LED array with Lambertian diffuser used for system calibration
Marcel Nations, Deepak Gupta, Nathan Bolte, Matt Thompson, and the TAE Team
TAE Technologies, Inc., 19631 Pauling, Foothill Ranch, CA 92610
In magnetically confined fusion plasmas, the effective ionic charge (𝑍𝑒𝑓𝑓) is a measure of the plasma contamination from impurities:
Zeff FROM VISIBLE BREMSSTRAHLUNG EMISSION
Survey spectrometer: 250-680 nm (Avantes Inc.) 12 optical chords
1⁄2” collimator optics
PMT detectors
600 mm fiber optics Bandpass filter:
l0: 523.5 nm
FWHM: ~1.5 nm
𝑛 𝑍2
𝑍𝑒𝑓𝑓=𝑖𝑖𝑖 (1)
𝑖 𝑛𝑖𝑍𝑖
where 𝑛𝑖 and 𝑍𝑖 are the density and charged state of
individual ionic species present in the plasma, respectively Such impurities can account for substantial radiative power
losses and thus knowledge of 𝑍𝑒𝑓𝑓 profiles is critical
One method to determine 𝑍𝑒𝑓𝑓 is to measure Bremsstrahlung continuum radiation over a small spectral range free from line radiation
BREMSSTRAHLUNG = “BREAKING RADIATION”
NIR spectrum doesn’t appear to have large line radiation found in the visible (green) region
NIR region is more consistent with theoretical Bremsstrahlung vs. wavelength than the visible (green) region
Above 700 nm, it appears far more feasible that the local spectral minima are approaching the Bremsstrahlung baseline
electron-ion
Spectral Bremsstrahlung emissivity is given by the
following equation (assuming quasi-neutrality, 𝑛𝑒 = 𝑖 𝑛𝑖𝑍𝑖):
where 𝑛 is the electron density, 𝑇 is the electron 𝑒𝑒
(3)
Continuous
arises from electron deceleration due to Coulomb collisions in high-temperature plasmas
(e−i) Bremsstrahlung
emission
𝑔 𝑛2𝑍 𝑒−h𝑐𝜆𝑇𝑒
𝜖𝑒−𝑖 𝜆 = 1.516 × 10−30 𝑓𝑓 𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓 [W/cm3/nm/sr] (2)
𝜆2 𝑇 𝑒
temperature (eV), 𝜆 is the wavelength, and 𝑔𝑓𝑓 is the free- free gaunt factor:
Li wall-conditioning helped keep impurity levels low
Emissivity profiles are obtained from chord measurements of plasma brightness
0.15
𝑔 =1.35𝑇 ; 0.1keV≤𝑇 ≤2.0keV 𝑓𝑓 𝑒 𝑒
MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY
Optical mounts housing an array of focusing lenses are
installed near the center plane of the machine (“A-plane”)
Quasi-cylindrical volumes of the plasma are sampled at multiple lines-of-sight and collected emission signals are focused into quartz optical fibers
The optical fibers then rout measured light to a separate room where the detection system is located
Before reaching the detectors, light passes through bandpass filters which transmit only at a narrow spectral region free from line radiation
Irradiance calibration is applied and measured line- integrated plasma brightness are Abel-inverted to get local emissivity profiles
CHALLENGES
FromEq2)𝜖𝑒−𝑖 1000nm ≈0.27
Time evolution of 𝑛 and 𝑇 profiles are obtained from 𝑒𝑒
Thomson scattering and, together with Eq. (2) and (3), are used to calculate 𝑍𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑟, 𝑡
Neutral Beam Injection (NBI) termination experiments:
NIR: 1000 nm (10 nm FWHM); Visible: 523.5 nm (1.5 nm FWHM)
Visible Bremss drops over twice as much as NIR Bremss
Neutrals are involved in continuum electron-neutral Bremss (core) and the dissociation of molecular hydrogen (edge)
𝜖𝑒−𝑖 523nm
Higher NIR sensor detectivity needed
From Eq 2) 𝜖 ∝ 𝑇−0.35 𝑒−𝑖 𝑒
𝑻𝑒 is expected to be 10x higher
𝜖𝑒−𝑖 signal in C-2W should be approx.
half of that in C-2U
The new system must be optimized to keep SNR at a suitable level
Larger collimating optics (Ø1”) ~4x more signal
Lowpass digital filter to remove high-frequency content