Frequently asked questions.

Fusion is nature’s preferred source of energy. It’s the same process that powers the sun and stars, and it’s what makes life viable on Earth. It can be explained by Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, better known as E=mc2. Energy equals mass multiplied by the speed of light, squared. Fusing two light elements together produces a new element (or elements) whose aggregate mass is slightly less than the combined mass of the original two elements. This rather tiny difference in mass, multiplied by the incredibly large number of the speed of light (nearly 300 million meters per second), squared, drives a tremendous release of energy.

In TAE’s future fusion power plant, hydrogen and boron atoms will fuse inside of a stable, superhot plasma to produce an even more energetic light than the sun. When the heat generated by that light warms the walls of the fusion machine’s plasma confinement vessel, a network of pipes will spring into action to cool the fusion machine’s interior by collecting that heat into a fluid and ushering it to a steam generator. The steam spins a turbine that then drives an electric generator, similar to what happens in operating power plants today. TAE’s unique fusion core supplies a superior and environmentally benign heat source for future power plants.

Generating power from a terrestrial fusion power plant depends on two conditions: first, plasma needs to be confined in the device, and then the confined plasma needs to be maintained at a high enough temperature for a long enough amount of time to sustain the fusion reaction. TAE calls this the Hot Enough Long Enough (HE/LE) requirement.

 For reactor performance levels, “Hot Enough” means reaching at least 100 million degrees Celsius, a temperature that is readily achievable today. However, sustaining that hot environment “Long Enough” for steady fusion is extremely challenging because plasma is a delicate substance that must be protected from conditions that would otherwise decay it or cool it down. Terrestrially achievable plasma contains very few particles, especially compared to the particle density in the areas surrounding the plasma, such as the metallic walls of a fusion machine’s confinement vessel or even the air we breathe. Consequently, those areas can store much greater amounts of heat than what is contained in the plasma. These factors are responsible for the rapid loss of energy out of the plasma and into the environment. A commercial fusion machine’s goal is to minimize this loss so plasma can be maintained with less energy than the fusion reaction generates. By doing so, net energy can then be released to the grid.

 Over the past 50 years, the different fusion efforts around the world have worked to overcome the “Hot Enough/Long Enough” challenge in different ways. In December 2022, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s National Ignition Facility (NIF) recorded net energy gain for the first time in the history of fusion research, and repeated their findings in 2023 and 2024. Read TAE’s statement on how this landmark achievement marks the dawn of the fusion age. Learn more about bringing fusion power to the grid on TAE’s podcast Good Clean Energy.

You are probably familiar with the different states of matter: solids, liquids, and gases. Plasma is considered the fourth state of matter. If you heat up an ice cube, it will transform from a solid (ice) to liquid (water) to gas (steam). If you superheat the gas further, negatively charged electrons will break free from the core of the formerly electrically neutral parent atoms, rendering them positively charged. These are called ions. This combination of highly energized positively charged ions and the negatively charged electrons forms a soup called plasma – imagine lightning.

Achieving fusion is essentially the task of creating and containing lightning in a laboratory. Plasma is a fickle, oozy substance. The challenge of confining it is akin to holding Jell-O together using rubber bands. You could try adding an increasing number of rubber bands in an effort to create a suitable physical barrier to hold the plasma in place. But a more effective approach may be to seek ways to alter the texture of plasma to make it inherently more cohesive – similar to adding more gelatin to thicken runny Jell-O.

 TAE Technologies’ unique approach to containing plasma begins with magnetic confinement, which is exactly as it sounds: Plasma is held inside of the fusion device with the help of strong magnetic fields.

 There are different types of magnetic confinement designs, and TAE’s machines incorporate the “Field-Reversed Configuration,” or FRC. FRC is a method for magnetic confinement that does more with less: The FRC plasma confines itself with its own magnetic field, so an FRC machine needs fewer magnets to sustain plasma confinement. Fewer magnets allows for a smaller, more power-efficient machine with a higher-energy plasma thanks to the pressure created by the plasma’s internal currents.

 But TAE’s patented approach to fusion doesn’t end with FRC. Across a 20-plus year history of innovation, TAE has elevated the FRC design with its proprietary neutral particle accelerator beam technology and power storage and supply systems. Those inventions combine the deepest insights from accelerator physics and plasma physics to confine plasma with greater heat, stability and energy efficiency.

 When a seed plasma is formed in a TAE fusion machine, the device’s neutral beams inject high-energy particles that increase the plasma’s temperature and density, and drive the current that produces the plasma’s self-generated magnetic field. (This technique for FRC plasma formation is a first in the fusion industry; you can read more about TAE’s breakthrough in FRC plasma formation here.) The neutral beams then continue to heat and stabilize the plasma to fusion relevant conditions as the plasma’s internal magnetic field works with the machine’s exterior magnets to keep the plasma confined. 

This approach to plasma confinement is what allows TAE machines to have a leaner, streamlined machine design that is faster to build, lower in cost, and more efficient with energy. As a result, this means fewer energy losses and more energy to release to the grid.

The fusion process is the exact opposite of fission. Although both are carbon-free, occur at the nuclear level and release energy as a byproduct, fusion achieves this by combining light elements such as hydrogen, deuterium, and boron, while fission splits up heavy atoms such as uranium and plutonium. Fusion doesn’t produce long-lived radioactive waste, whereas the radioactive waste stream from fission can last for 10,000 years or more.

A fusion plant cannot experience a meltdown. Fission is propagated by a chain reaction. Once the reaction starts, it’s hard to stop. In contrast, fusion is a driven process, meaning all steps are deliberately initiated and actively maintained. Once the external drivers stop, the fusion process stops – faster than any kill switch or emergency power-off system could shut down a plant. Fusion possesses nature’s ultimate safety valve: there is simply no way for a meltdown to occur. In this way, fusion is an inherently safe proposition.

The fundamental difference is in the parameter space of the fuel. In cold fusion, research is being pursued at room temperature, within tabletop experiments. The fuel used in cold fusion is approximately the density of liquids or solids. In contrast, hot fusion occurs in large, sophisticated machinery capable of achieving temperatures in the millions or billions degrees Celsius, and produces very low-density plasmas (100,000x less dense than air at sea level). Almost all of the world’s fusion research is focused on hot fusion.

There are several known fuel cycles for terrestrial fusion, i.e. different elements that can be fused to produce fusion reactions and, ultimately, electricity. The most common fuel cycle is deuterium- tritium, or D-T, because of its comparatively low temperature threshold for achieving the Hot Enough requirement for fusion (100-150 million degrees Celsius). Other fuel cycles include deuterium-helium-3 or D-He-3 (many hundreds of millions degrees Celsius) and hydrogen-boron or p-B11 (in the billion-degree Celsius range).

D-T
Benefits: The lowest temperature for a fusion reaction to occur; fastest reacting fuel cycle, with very large energy output per reaction.
Challenges: Tritium is a radioactive element – it does not occur in nature and must be bred; its associated neutrons will accelerate aging in power plant materials.

D-He3
Benefits: Substantially less radioactivity and production of tritium than with D-T fusion, leading to longer power plant life; most energy output per reaction, largely in the form of energetic protons, which makes direct energy conversion possible.
Challenges: Residual radioactivity; no substantive terrestrial He3 resources – must be mined on the lunar surface.

p-B11
Benefits: Aneutronic (primary reaction yields no neutrons); cleanest, safest, highly abundant, and environmentally friendly fusion pathway; enables scalable, cost-competitive electricity.
Challenges: Requires superior confinement and operational conditions to reach the considerably higher temperatures needed; reacts more slowly than other fuel cycles; less energy output per reaction.

No. There is a new confluence of factors that makes the entire pursuit of fusion different than it was even 10 years ago. In the early years, we didn’t understand the true magnitude of the challenge, and more importantly, we didn’t have the proper tools to address it. Exponential progress in the science behind fusion, coupled with the emergence of critical support technologies, has now created the proper tool chest to bring us to the cusp of fusion. These tools include expanded scientific knowledge about plasma behavior, artificial intelligence, machine learning, faster electronics, magnets, improved diagnostics, shorter latency feedback loops, materials science, vacuum technology, power electronics – the list goes on. Whether discovered by TAE Technologies, our fusion colleagues, or a serendipitous development in an unrelated field, these advances are now cumulatively and critically enabling. With over $5B invested in 25 private fusion companies, as well as massive international efforts underway, there is no doubt that commercial power generation based on fusion is fast approaching.

With more awareness about the need for an environmentally benign, high power density energy solution, and with thought leaders such as the late Stephen Hawking strongly advocating for fusion as a permanent clean energy solution for the planet, it makes sense that more companies are joining the field. In recent years, new technologies have come into existence that provide foundational capabilities to accelerate development and fundamentally enable fusion power.

Advances in machine learning, artificial intelligence, computer-controlled power management and superconducting materials – to name just a few – all make the achievement of fusion inevitable. That potential leads to more investor interest and financing, which, by extension, leads to the awakening you’re seeing now.

The existence of parallel programs, both public and private, enables holistic exploration of the fusion opportunity, and all efforts approach their research in different ways. For TAE, private funding provides a singular forcing function that ensures efficient use of capital, disciplined project management, and focus on the mission-critical elements and goals. TAE Technologies was founded with the express purpose of developing and licensing commercially viable fusion energy technologies and has charted its course to this outcome ever since. For the past 25 years, the company has operated on a “money by milestone” model, where each round of funding is only earned based on delivering on milestones that were promised to investors.